英语翻译We find also interesting similarities between Real et al.(2000) and the present paper.The former,in its first study,defines four main aspects to classify landscapes:the presence/absence of water,theartificiality of the scene,its roughness

英语翻译We find also interesting similarities between Real et al.(2000) and the present paper.The former,in its first study,defines four main aspects to classify landscapes:the presence/absence of water,theartificiality of the scene,its roughness
英语翻译
We find also interesting similarities between Real et al.(2000) and the present paper.The former,
in its first study,defines four main aspects to classify landscapes:the presence/absence of water,the
artificiality of the scene,its roughness and the human presence.These four characteristics are included
in the current model; this is,amount of water,degree of wilderness,horizon and the presence of
positive and negative antropic elements,respectively.In the same paper,the second study presents
different regression models that confirm the positive (negative) relationship between the beauty of
landscape and the amount of water (amount of humanized elements).
4.Conclusions
We have implemented a straightforward method for assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes.
The same methodology can be applied to other areas in order to rank and explain the scenic beauty of
landscapes.The information supplied by the model can enrich the decision-making process that has to
evaluate competing sites for the location of recreational facilities that will suit a given target
population.
According to the results,the degree of wilderness and positively evaluated man-made features play a
key role in determining the visual quality of the rural scene.These are followed by the area of water
and the colour contrast.Given that man-made features are among the most important elements of the
perceived visual quality of the landscape,planning the modernization of rural areas should include the
impact of such features on the landscape and the possibility of using such features as a rural
development tool.The other two elements that can be altered by landscape planners are the percentage
of vegetation and the colour contrast.Thus,the multi-crop land allocation plus the use of natural cover
between olive trees lead to a higher visual quality of the agricultural landscapes of Andalusia.
6
Finally,in considering the impact of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy on the landscape,we find
two negative effects.The first is the reduction of crop diversity,since,as the results suggest,the
greater the homogeneity of our agricultural landscape,the lower its perceived visual beauty,due
mainly to the lack of colour contrast.Second,the maintenance in production of land of poor
agricultural quality,as an alternative to forestry,decreases the perception of wilderness in the
landscape,and thus its beauty.

英语翻译We find also interesting similarities between Real et al.(2000) and the present paper.The former,in its first study,defines four main aspects to classify landscapes:the presence/absence of water,theartificiality of the scene,its roughness
楼上的是电脑翻译的 别给他分

我们觉得也很有趣实等人之间的相似性。 （2000年）和本文件。前者，
在第一项研究中，定义了四个主要方面进行分类景观：存在/水，缺席
现场人工，其粗糙度和人类的存在。这四个特征包括
在当前的模式，这是量水，荒野程度，以及存在的地平线
积极和消极antropic元素，分别为。在同一份文件，第二个研究提出
不同的回归模型确定正（负）之间的关系，美
景观和...

全部展开

我们觉得也很有趣实等人之间的相似性。 （2000年）和本文件。前者，
在第一项研究中，定义了四个主要方面进行分类景观：存在/水，缺席
现场人工，其粗糙度和人类的存在。这四个特征包括
在当前的模式，这是量水，荒野程度，以及存在的地平线
积极和消极antropic元素，分别为。在同一份文件，第二个研究提出
不同的回归模型确定正（负）之间的关系，美
景观和水的数量（数额的人性化元素）。
4。结论
我们已经实施了评估农村景观的视觉质量的简单方法。
同样的方法可以适用于其他地区，以等级和风景秀丽的解释
景观。该模型提供的信息可以丰富决策过程，要
评估的康乐设施，适合特定的目标位置的竞争网站
人口。
根据研究结果，在旷野程度和积极评价人造功能发挥
在确定了关键作用，农村场景的视觉效果。这些都是其次是水域
和颜色对比。由于人为的特性之间的最重要因素是
知觉的景观视觉质量，规划对农村现代化应包括
影响这些功能对景观及利用等功能的可能性农村
开发工具。另外两个可以通过改变要素景观规划师的比例
植被和颜色对比。因此，多作物的土地分配以及使用的自然覆盖
橄榄树之间导致更高的安达卢西亚农业景观的视觉质量。
6
最后，在考虑欧盟的共同农业政策对景观的影响，我们发现
两个负面影响。首先是农作物多样性减少，因为正如该研究结果显示，该
同质性越大，我们的农业景观，降低其知觉视觉美感，由于
主要是缺乏色彩对比。第二，在土地的穷人制作维护
农业质量作为林业的替代，降低了荒野中的知觉
景观，因此它的美丽。
加分~！！。。。

收起